The impact of COVID-19 on trauma patients and orthopedic trauma operations at a single focused training center for trauma in Korea

Article information

J Trauma Inj. 2022;35(3):195-201

Publication date (electronic) : 2021 December 1

doi : https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2021.0078

Wonseok Choi, MD¹, Hanju Kim, MD¹, Whee Sung Son, MD¹, Seungyeob Sakong, MD¹, Jun-Min Cho, MD², Nak-Jun Choi, MD², Tae-Wook Noh, MD², Namryeol Kim, MD², Jae-Woo Cho, MD¹, Jong-Keon Oh, MD^,1

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

²Department of Trauma Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to Jong-Keon Oh, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Korea Tel: +82-2-2626-3088 E-mail: jkoh@korea.ac.kr

Received 2021 September 23; Revised 2021 November 12; Accepted 2021 November 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, which was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China [1]. The disease spread rapidly around the world and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020 [2]. The first case in Korea was reported on January 20, 2020 [3]. Currently, almost 270,000 people have been infected in Korea [4]. The spread of the disease has severely altered people’s daily lives, as well as the economy and healthcare system.

The incidence of traumatic injuries is influenced by several factors, including the environment and outbreaks of contagious diseases [5-7]. To control the spread of COVID-19, many countries implemented lockdown and/or social distancing policies. In Korea, the government restricted private gatherings according to the number of people with time limitations. In addition, sports facilities and restaurants were closed after designated hours. Social distancing in Korea was divided into three levels and was revised to four levels from July 1, 2020. Level 4 is defined as a pandemic, when the national quarantine system has reached its limit; people are advised to stay home as much as possible, and only private meetings of up to two people are allowed after 6 _PM [4].

The effects of COVID-19 on the volume of trauma patients in several countries have been reported [8-10]. The pandemic has altered the needs and provision of health care throughout the world. As a result of restrictive social measures, such as lockdown or social distancing, the incidence of crimes and traffic accidents (TAs) decreased sharply [11]. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the pandemic and social distancing policies on the volume of trauma patients at our trauma center. We hypothesized that the COVID-19 pandemic reduced the volume of trauma patients and that taking restrictive actions affected the number of patients who presented to the emergency department due to traumatic injuries.

METHODS

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The total number of patients was 3,032, including 1,752 male patients (51.8%) and 1,280 female patients (42.2%). The distribution of patients by sex was not statistically different (P=0.356). The average numbers of patients per year in the control and COVID-19 groups were 646.7 and 546.0, respectively. The average number of patients decreased by 15.6% in the COVID-19 group compared with the number of patients in the control group. The mean age of the patients was 54.9±21.9 years.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of patients from January to April, 2017–2021

A comparison of injury mechanisms between the two groups is shown in Table 2. The percentage of patients with TAs decreased from 25.0% in the control group to 18.2% in the COVID-19 group (P<0.0001). The proportions of patients with in-car TAs and pedestrian TAs decreased from 6.7% to 3.5% and 10.8% to 6.0%, respectively (P=0.0002 and P<0.0001). In contrast, the percentage of patients injured in bicycle TAs increased from 2.4% in the control group to 4.0% in the COVID-group (P=0.0128). The percentage of motorcycle accidents did not differ significantly between the two groups (5.2% and 4.8%, respectively, P=0.6343). Injuries from slips, falls, or injuries by machines at the workplace did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Table 2.

Comparison of trauma patients and mechanisms of injury between the control and COVID-19 groups

Table 3 presents a comparison of the percentage of patients with an ISS above 15 and the mortality rate between the two groups. The percentage of patients with an ISS score above 15 (9.6% and 9.6% in the control and COVID-19 groups, respectively) and the mortality rate (2.0% and 2.6% in the control and COVID-19 groups, respectively) did not change significantly.

Table 3.

Comparison of the number of patients with an ISS above 15 and mortality

Tables 4, 5 and Fig. 1 show the effects of social distancing on the number of trauma patients, TA, ISS, mortality, and orthopedic trauma operations. Table 6 summarizes the social distancing levels. When the social distancing level increased from self-distancing to level 2, the number of patients presenting to the emergency department per day decreased from 4.71 to 2.93, and when the social distancing level decreased from level 2 to level 1, the number of patients per day increased from 4.82 to 6.24. Overall, as the level of social distancing increased, the average number of patients decreased, and as the level of social distancing decreased, the number of patients increased. A similar pattern was observed in the number of patients who were injured by TAs, but not at all levels. When the social distancing level decreased from level 2.5 to level 2, the daily average number of TAs increased from 0.29 to 1.21. The number of orthopedic trauma operations changed in the same direction. Neither the number of patients with ISS above 15 nor the mortality rate was affected by social distancing levels. The correlation between the social distancing level and the number of patients was statistically significant in three comparison groups; the number of TA patients was statistically significant in one comparison group, and the number of orthopedic trauma operations was statistically significant in two comparison groups. The number of patients with an ISS >15 and the mortality rate did not show significant correlations in any comparison groups.

Table 4.

Correlations of social distancing levels with the number of patients, TAs, severity of injury, and orthopedic trauma operations

Table 5.

Poisson regression analysis of differences due to changes in social distancing levels

Fig. 1.

Patterns of the daily average number of patients, traffic accident (TA) incidents, orthopedic surgery (OS) operations, patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15, and mortality depending on social distancing levels.

Table 6.

Goals and guidelines of social distancing levels

DISCUSSION

This study evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the volume of trauma patients and orthopedic trauma operations at a single trauma center in Korea. A significant decline in trauma patients has been reported worldwide during the COVID-19 period. Our study also showed that the number of patients with traumatic injuries decreased during the COVID-19 era compared to the control group from before the COVID-19 pandemic (Table 1). We postulate that overall movement in our region declined after the outbreak of COVID-19 due to modifications of people’s behavior, including decreased time spent at work and social activities. Behavioral change in patients seeking medical assistance may also be a reason for the decline in patients presenting to the emergency department [12]. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a redistribution of public health resources; thus, restricted access to the emergency department due to COVID-19 patients may have also been responsible for the overall decline in trauma patients. However, our trauma center remained open during the pandemic period.

The proportion of patients experiencing TAs decreased during the COVID-19 period (Table 2). The percentages of patients injured in in-car TAs and pedestrian TAs decreased, whereas that of patients who experienced bicycle TAs increased significantly. The increased proportion of bicycle accidents may have been caused by the increased use of bicycles rather than public transportation or the use of bicycles for exercising rather than working out in public gyms. Although the number of patients was small, the incidence of motorcycle TAs did not differ between the two groups. Other injury mechanisms did not change significantly. Some studies have highlighted psychological changes due to quarantine or isolation; an investigation exploring the effects of these psychological changes on self-inflicted injuries would be interesting [13].

Injury severity and mortality were not significantly different between the two patient groups (Table 3). In other words, during the COVID-19 period, patients had injuries comparable to those of patients before the COVID-19 period.

Many countries are taking social actions to slow down or stop the spread of COVID-19. These measures may also prevent accidents. Staying home and limiting social activities may reduce the number of trauma incidents, including TAs. We evaluated the adjacent social distancing levels to see the effect of changing the social distancing level on the volume of trauma patients. The volume of trauma patients and orthopedic trauma operations decreased when the level of social distancing increased and vice versa (Tables 4, 5). This may have been due to decreased movement and social activities in response to strengthened social distancing. Although not all the results showed statistical significance, the social distancing level was inversely related to the number of trauma patients, TA incidents, and the number of orthopedic trauma operations. These results are in agreement with studies from other countries [8,10,14,15]. Neither the number of patients with an ISS >15 nor mortality was significantly different in the control group compared with the COVID-19 group. The lack of differences may be explained in two ways. First, the number of cases may have been too small to see the correlation. Second, trauma injuries can be severe regardless of whether the number of patients declines. Even during social distancing, an increase in trauma patients can be anticipated as people become familiar with the restrictive measures.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused major challenges in managing trauma patients [14,16,17]. Even in this challenging situation, health care providers and trauma specialists should pay particular attention and be prepared for an increase in patients as social distancing levels decrease. Trauma care specialists should also be aware that severe traumatic injuries can happen at any time and they should be ready to provide support at all times. The protocols that existed before the outbreak of COVID-19 may be difficult to maintain. Protective measures for health care workers might lead to delays in the rapid treatment of critical trauma patients, surgery can be postponed due to protection against COVID-19 or detection of COVID-19 in a patient, and shortages of blood products can lead to insufficient treatment of critical patients. Therefore, many changes are necessary and improvisations based on previous management strategies must be taken [18,19]. Appropriate allocation of resources such as space, equipment, and healthcare personnel should take place. Strict use of personal protective equipment should be mandated, along with minimizing the required staff in the trauma bay and operating rooms.

One of the limitations of this study is that it was conducted at a single trauma center located in a specific region. The results of this study do not reflect the situation of all trauma centers, and inconsistent results may be observed across different institutions. To validate the effects of COVID-19 on trauma patients, a nationwide multi-center study with more patients is necessary. A second limitation of this study is that patients were selected in certain periods. To determine the effects of COVID-19, we compared the volume of patients between January and April in 2020 and 2021 to the volume in the corresponding months from 2017 to 2019. The volume of patients can be affected by weather and season, which was the main reason why we excluded patients treated from May to December 2020. To overcome selection bias, we compared the same periods in 3 years before COVID-19. A comparison of patients treated throughout the entire year might provide more accurate insights on the effects of COVID-19 on the volume of trauma patients, but using data from the same period in 2 years for comparison may provide correlations over a longer period. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of social distancing, the period from August 2, 2020 to November 23, 2020 was analyzed. The level of social distancing remained the same for longer times in other periods. Thus, this period was chosen to determine the effects of changes in social distancing measures on the volume and severity of trauma patients.

In conclusion, the volume of trauma patients and orthopedic trauma operations decreased during the COVID-19 period at our institution. Taking restrictive actions and self-isolation had several trauma-related effects, including a reduction in the number of injuries. A nationwide study is needed for a more conclusive assessment of the correlation between COVID-19 and trauma incidence.

Article information Continued