KST
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > J Trauma Inj > Volume 33(2); 2020 > Article
-
Original Article
Comparison of Outcomes and Recurrence in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Patients Treated by Burr-Hole Drainage with or without Irrigation - Jongwook Choi, M.D., Kum Whang, M.D., Ph.D., Sungmin Cho, M.D., Ph.D., Jongyeon Kim, M.D.
-
Journal of Trauma and Injury 2020;33(2):81-87.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2020.003
Published online: June 5, 2020
- 8,762 Views
- 159 Download
- 4 Crossref
Department of Neurosurgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
- Correspondence to Jongyeon Kim, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 26426, Korea Tel: +82-33-741-0592 Fax: +82-33-746-2287 E-mail: jjongse@hanmail.net
• Received: January 22, 2020 • Revised: February 26, 2020 • Accepted: March 12, 2020
Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Trauma
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
-
Purpose
- Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common disease in elderly patients and is usually treated by burr-hole drainage. However, the optimal surgical technique for treating CSDH has not been determined. In this study, we analyzed outcomes and recurrence rates after burr-hole drainage with or without irrigation in patients with CSDH.
-
Methods
- Eighty-two CSDH patients treated with burr-hole drainage at Wonju Severance Christian Hospital from March 2015 to June 2016 were enrolled in this study. The subjects were divided into three groups based on the surgical technique performed as follows: single burr-hole drainage without irrigation (group A, n=47), single burr-hole drainage with irrigation (group B, n=14), or double burr-hole drainage with irrigation (group C, n=21). These three groups were compared with respect to clinical and radiological factors and the recurrence rate, and independent factors predicting recurrence were sought.
-
Results
- After burr-hole drainage, CSDH recurred in 15 (18.3%) of the 82 patients, and six patients (7.3%) required reoperation. More specifically, recurrence was observed in 12 patients (25.5%) in group A, one (7.1%) in group B, and two (9.5%) in group C. The number of burr-holes did not significantly affect recurrence (odds ratio [OR]=0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–2.38), but irrigation had a significant effect (OR=0.20; 95% CI: 0.04–0.97).
-
Conclusions
- This study shows that irrigation during burr-hole surgery in CSDH patients significantly reduced the risk of recurrence, regardless of the number of burrholes used. We therefore recommend the use of active irrigation during burr-hole drainage surgery in CSDH patients.
- Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a relatively common neurosurgical disease, especially in elderly patients [1-5]. In 2016, its global incidence was reported to be 1–13.5 per 100,000 per year [2], and its incidence continues to increase concomitantly with population aging [4,6]. In roughly two-thirds of cases (most commonly in men), there is a history of minor trauma [2]. Although small CSDHs can be resolved without surgery, surgical treatment is required in most cases [2]. The prognosis of CSDH is relatively favorable, but the postoperative recurrence rate has been reported to range widely, from as little as 2% to as high as 37% [1,2,5,7-10].
- Single burr-hole craniostomy and drainage is the most commonly used treatment modality [1,5,8,11], but various surgical techniques, such as multi burr-hole craniostomy, massive irrigation, irrigation with thrombin, small or large craniotomy, and membranectomy, have been reported to reduce recurrence [1,2,11-17], and as a result, controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical method for CSDH.
- The present study was performed to compare CSDH recurrence rates after single or double burr-hole drainage with or without irrigation, with the ultimate aim of determining which method is most effective for reducing recurrence.
INTRODUCTION
- Patient selection
- We retrospectively studied the archived medical records of patients who underwent burr-hole craniostomy with drainage for CSDH at a single institution from March 2015 to June 2016. Surgical procedures were classified into the following three groups according to the surgical procedure used at the surgeon’s discretion: single burr-hole craniostomy with drainage, but without irrigation (group A, n=47); single burr-hole craniostomy with drainage and irrigation (group B, n=14); and double burr-hole craniostomy with drainage and irrigation (group C, n=21). In group C, two large burr-holes were used with massive irrigation through each hole to provide more effective subdural space irrigation. Group selection bias was checked using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the chi-square test. During the follow-up period, non-recurrence was defined as the absence of new neurological symptoms with no increase in hemorrhage on follow-up brain computed tomography (CT). We excluded one case of craniotomy performed due to postoperative bleeding and another case in which surgery was required for post-craniostomy empyema. The study was approved beforehand by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine (CR317094).
- Surgical procedures and management
- All patients underwent single or double burr-hole trephination operations with closed drainage under general anesthesia. After dural incision and hemostasis, the outer membrane enclosing the hematoma was opened. In group A, only a drainage catheter was inserted into the hematoma cavity and the operation was terminated. In group B, a drainage catheter was inserted and irrigation was performed through the catheter. In group C, irrigation was performed directly through two burr-holes, so that the irrigation fluid flowing through one burr-hole came out through the other burr-hole, and after sufficient irrigation, a drainage catheter was inserted into the subdural space. In principle, in all patients who received irrigation, it was performed with cold normal saline until the color of the drainage fluid became clear. After surgery, the drainage catheter was connected to a closed drainage system, and all patients were maintained in the supine position and supplied with sufficient fluid to promote brain expansion. All patients underwent brain CT 3 days after surgery to confirm CSDH reduction, and subsequently at 1-week intervals to check for recurrence. All patients were evaluated for recurrence through at least 10 days of inpatient treatment and at follow-up visits extending for at least 3 months.
- Statistical analysis
- Data were collected on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, radiological factors, the surgical method, and recurrence. The associations of all variables with recurrence were evaluated using the two-sample t-test or the chi-square test (Fisher’s exact test). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the degree to which the surgical method could predict CSDH recurrence, and the results were expressed as odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was accepted for p-values <0.05, and the analysis was conducted using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
METHODS
- Eighty-two CSDH patients were successfully treated by burr-hole drainage, of whom 73.2% were men. Their mean age was 70.2 years, the overall recurrence rate was 18.3%, and reoperation was required in 7.3% of cases (Table 1).
- These measures were compared across the three surgical methods using ANOVA for age and the chi-square test for other parameters to justify combining the three groups of patients (Table 2). No significant differences were found among the three surgical methods. Although no significant difference in recurrence was observed among the three study groups, the recurrence rate in group A (single burr-hole craniostomy with drainage, but without irrigation; n=12; 25.5%) was notably higher than that in groups B (n=1; 7.1%) or C (n=2; 9.5%).
- Of the demographic factors and preoperative conditions that were analyzed–including patients’ history–only preoperative antiplatelet medication use was found to be significantly related with CSDH recurrence (p=0.021). Furthermore, single burr-hole craniostomy with drainage, but without irrigation, was found to have a significant association with CSDH recurrence (p=0.049) (Table 1).
- The number of burr-holes did not significantly affect recurrence (p=0.332) (Table 3). However, the use of intraoperative irrigation was found to reduce the incidence of recurrence (group A vs. groups B and C; p=0.049) (Table 4). Additionally, logistic regression analysis showed that intraoperative irrigation resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the CSDH recurrence rate (OR=0.20; 95% CI: 0.04–0.97), but the use of two burr-holes showed no statistical significance (OR=0.38; 95% CI: 0.60–2.38) (Table 5).
RESULTS
- CSDH is a relatively common disease that usually occurs after mild trauma in the elderly [1,3,8,18]. It is usually treated surgically and has low postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. However, its postoperative recurrence rate is high; therefore, the question of how best to treat CSDH remains a meaningful topic in the neurosurgical field [5,19].
- Many studies have investigated CSDH recurrence. The factors reported to be associated with its recurrence after surgery include diabetes, anticoagulant therapy, lack of use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, male sex, the presence of bilateral hematomas, a midline shift of ≥1 cm, and presentation with hemiparesis, but the published results contain considerable variation [2,4,12,20-24]. In the present study, the only non-surgical factor found to be associated with recurrence was preoperative antiplatelet medication use.
- CSDH is associated with high levels of vasoactive cytokines, inflammatory mediators, and fibrinolytic factors [8,13,25]. Saito et al. [26] reported that the risk of CSDH recurrence increased when high concentrations of these substances remained after surgery, implying that complete evacuation of hematoma during surgery is important. We expected that double burr-hole craniostomy with drainage catheter insertion after massive saline irrigation would remove residual cytokines and fibrinolytic factors more effectively than single burr-hole irrigation and thereby reduce the recurrence rate of CSDH.
- The current treatment of choice for CSDH is burr-hole drainage [8], but the optimal surgical technique remains controversial [4]. Taussky et al. [13] reported a higher recurrence rate in a 34-case single burr-hole group than in a group containing 63 cases where two burr-holes were used, but Han et al. [27] reported a higher recurrence rate in a 129-case double burr-hole group than in a 51-case single burr-hole group. In addition, three relatively large retrospective studies reported no significant difference in the recurrence rate between single and double burr-hole procedures [2,28,29], which concurs with our observations.
- Regarding the use of irrigation, Kim et al. [1] reported a higher recurrence rate in a 114-case saline irrigation group with closed drainage than in a 38-case non-irrigation group with closed drainage. Conversely, Ishibashi et al. [14], Jang et al. [8], and Lee et al. [5] reported better prognoses after irrigation. The present study also showed that the recurrence rate was significantly lower after intraoperative irrigation.
- Based on our observation that intraoperative irrigation reduced CSDH recurrence, we suggest that additional research is needed to optimize the irrigation procedure. Shimamura et al. [11] compared the use of thrombin irrigation in 36 patients and saline irrigation in 43 patients and concluded that irrigation with thrombin solution reduced recurrence. In future research, we intend to investigate the effects of the composition and osmolarity of the irrigation solution on CSDH recurrence.
- A number of studies have been conducted to identify factors associated with CSDH recurrence, but the present study is the first to compare the effects of the number of burr-holes and irrigation in a single cohort. However, the present study has the obvious limitations of bias and a small sample size, and is inherently limited by its retrospective, single-center design. A prospective, randomized, controlled study is required to resolve the issues arising from discrepancies in results across studies to enable us to meet the challenge posed by the high recurrence rate after burr-hole craniostomy for CSDH.
DISCUSSION
- The incidence of CSDH is certain to increase in parallel with population aging, and ongoing research is therefore required to develop better treatments. In the present study, the overall recurrence rate of CSDH after burr-hole drainage surgery was 18.3%. In patients with a history of preoperative antiplatelet medication use, the recurrence rate was particularly high (53.3%), but other medical comorbidities were not found to be related to recurrence. However, the use of intraoperative irrigation was found to reduce the recurrence rate significantly, from 25.5% to 8.6%, whereas the number of burr-holes did not have any significant effect. Accordingly, we recommend active irrigation during burr-hole craniostomy in patients with CSDH.
CONCLUSION
Table 1.Patients’ characteristics according to recurrence
| Total (n=82) | No recurrence (n=67; 81.7%) | Recurrence (n=15; 18.3%) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) | 60 (73.2) | 50 (74.6) | 10 (66.7) | 0.532 |
| Age | 70.2±12.1 | 70.2±12.0 | 70.1±13.4 | 0.986 |
| Head trauma history | 51 (62.2) | 43 (64.2) | 8 (53.3) | 0.434 |
| History | ||||
| Hypertension | 50 (61.0) | 39 (58.2) | 11 (73.3) | 0.278 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 20 (24.4) | 18 (26.9) | 2 (13.3) | 0.339 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 11 (13.4) | 8 (11.9) | 3 (20.0) | 0.414 |
| CRF | 4 (4.9) | 3 (4.5) | 1 (6.7) | 0.562 |
| Heart disease | 8 (9.8) | 6 (9.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.634 |
| Liver disease | 4 (4.9) | 3 (4.5) | 1 (6.7) | 0.562 |
| Alcoholism | 21 (25.6) | 18 (26.9) | 3 (20.0) | 0.749 |
| Smoking | 18 (22.0) | 17 (25.4) | 1 (6.7) | 0.171 |
| Coagulopathya | 6 (7.3) | 5 (7.5) | 1 (6.7) | 1.000 |
| Antiplatelet medication | 22 (26.8) | 14 (20.9) | 8 (53.3) | 0.021 |
| Dementia | 3 (3.7) | 2 (3.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.459 |
| Preoperative GCS | 13.8±2.5 | 13.9±2.6 | 13.5±2.4 | 0.665 |
| 15–14 | 61 (74.4) | 52 (77.6) | 9 (60.0) | 0.194 |
| 13–9 | 13 (15.9) | 9 (13.4) | 4 (26.7) | 0.243 |
| 8–3 | 8 (9.8) | 6 (9.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.634 |
| Bilateral lesion | 31 (37.8) | 23 (34.3) | 8 (53.3) | 0.170 |
| Computed tomography findings | ||||
| Preoperative homogenous hematoma | 35 (43.2) | 29 (43.9) | 6 (40.0) | 0.781 |
| H/N in homogenous hematoma | 36.3±10.9 | 35.6±11.5 | 40.0±6.3 | 0.373 |
| Preoperative hematoma thickness | 20.7±6.6 | 20.8±6.7 | 20.2±6.3 | 0.750 |
| Postoperative hematoma thickness | 11.2±5.4 | 11.1±5.6 | 11.7±4.6 | 0.700 |
| Prognosis using GOS | 4.7±0.75 | 4.8±0.74 | 4.6±0.83 | 0.458 |
| 5–4 (good) | 79 (96.3) | 65 (97.0) | 14 (93.3) | 0.459 |
| 3–1 (poor) | 3 (3.7) | 2 (3.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.459 |
| Operation methods | ||||
| Single burr-hole (group A) | 47 (57.3) | 35 (52.2) | 12 (80.0) | 0.049 |
| Single burr-hole irrigation (group B) | 14 (17.1) | 13 (19.4) | 1 (6.7) | 0.448 |
| Double burr-hole irrigation (group C) | 21 (25.6) | 19 (28.4) | 2 (13.3) | 0.332 |
Table 2.Comparison of three surgical methods
Table 3.Postoperative outcomes according to the number of burr-holes
Table 4.Postoperative outcomes according to intraoperative irrigation status
Table 5.Logistic regression to calculate ORs for CSDH recurrence after burr-hole operation according to the surgical method used.
| Crude OR (95% CI) | Adjusted ORa (95% CI) | Adjusted ORb (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Irrigation | 0.06 (0.07–1.06) | 0.29 (0.07–1.16) | 0.20 (0.04–0.97) |
| Two burr-holes | 0.39 (0.08–1.89) | 0.41 (0.08–2.06) | 0.38 (0.60–2.38) |
- 1. Kim DH, Kim HS, Choi HJ, Han IH, Cho WH, Nam KH. Recurrence of the chronic subdural hematoma after burr-hole drainage with or without intraoperative saline irrigation. Korean J Neurotrauma 2014;10:101–5. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 2. Gernsback J, Kolcun JPG, Jagid J. To drain or two drains: recurrences in chronic subdural hematomas. World Neurosurg 2016;95:447–50. ArticlePubMed
- 3. Erol FS, Topsakal C, Ozveren MF, Kaplan M, Tiftikci MT. Irrigation vs. closed drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. J Clin Neurosci 2005;12:261–3. ArticlePubMed
- 4. Leroy HA, Aboukaïs R, Reyns N, Bourgeois P, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, et al. Predictors of functional outcomes and recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:1895–900. ArticlePubMed
- 5. Lee C, Park DS, Song SW, Chun YI, Cho J, Moon CT, et al. Effect of intra-operative saline irrigation during burr hole surgery on the recurrence for chronic subdural hematomas. Nerve 2015;1:26–9. ArticlePDF
- 6. Borger V, Vatter H, Oszvald Á, Marquardt G, Seifert V, Güresir E. Chronic subdural haematoma in elderly patients: a retrospective analysis of 322 patients between the ages of 65-94 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1549–54. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 7. Okada Y, Akai T, Okamoto K, Iida T, Takata H, Iizuka H. A comparative study of the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma--burr hole drainage versus burr hole irrigation. Surg Neurol 2002;57:405–9; discussion 410. ArticlePubMed
- 8. Jang KM, Kwon JT, Hwang SN, Park YS, Nam TK. Comparison of the outcomes and recurrence with three surgical techniques for chronic subdural hematoma: single, double burr hole, and double burr hole drainage with irrigation. Korean J Neurotrauma 2015;11:75–80. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 9. Santarius T, Lawton R, Kirkpatrick PJ, Hutchinson PJ. The management of primary chronic subdural haematoma: a questionnaire survey of practice in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Br J Neurosurg 2008;22:529–34. ArticlePubMed
- 10. Lega BC, Danish SF, Malhotra NR, Sonnad SS, Stein SC. Choosing the best operation for chronic subdural hematoma: a decision analysis. J Neurosurg 2010;113:615–21. ArticlePubMed
- 11. Shimamura N, Ogasawara Y, Naraoka M, Ohnkuma H. Irrigation with thrombin solution reduces recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma in high-risk patients: preliminary report. J Neurotrauma 2009;26:1929–33. ArticlePubMed
- 12. Tahsim-Oglou Y, Beseoglu K, Hänggi D, Stummer W, Steiger HJ. Factors predicting recurrence of chronic subdural haematoma: the influence of intraoperative irrigation and low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1063–7; discussion 1068. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 13. Taussky P, Fandino J, Landolt H. Number of burr holes as independent predictor of postoperative recurrence in chronic subdural haematoma. Br J Neurosurg 2008;22:279–82. ArticlePubMed
- 14. Ishibashi A, Yokokura Y, Adachi H. A comparative study of treatments for chronic subdural hematoma: burr hole drainage versus burr hole drainage with irrigation. Kurume Med J 2011;58:35–9. ArticlePubMed
- 15. Kim JH, Kang DS, Kim JH, Kong MH, Song KY. Chronic subdural hematoma treated by small or large craniotomy with membranectomy as the initial treatment. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011;50:103–8. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 16. Lee JK, Choi JH, Kim CH, Lee HK, Moon JG. Chronic subdural hematomas : a comparative study of three types of operative procedures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;46:210–4. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 17. Zakaraia AM, Adnan JS, Haspani MSM, Naing NN, Abdullah JM. Outcome of 2 different types of operative techniques practiced for chronic subdural hematoma in Malaysia: an analysis. Surg Neurol 2008;69:608–15; discussion 616. ArticlePubMed
- 18. Regan JM, Worley E, Shelburne C, Pullarkat R, Watson JC. Burr hole washout versus craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma: patient outcome and cost analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0115085. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 19. Javadi A, Amirjamshidi A, Aran S, Hosseini SH. A randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of burr-hole irrigation with and without drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: a preliminary report. World Neurosurg 2011;75:731–6; discussion 620. ArticlePubMed
- 20. Weigel R, Hohenstein A, Schlickum L, Weiss C, Schilling L. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition for arterial hypertension reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with chronic subdural hematoma possibly by an antiangiogenic mechanism. Neurosurgery 2007;61:788–92; discussion 792. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 21. Lin CC, Lu YM, Chen TH, Wang SP, Hsiao SH, Lin MS. Quantitative assessment of post-operative recurrence of chronic subdural haematoma using mean haematoma density. Brain Inj 2014;28:1082–6. ArticlePubMed
- 22. Jung YG, Jung NY, Kim E. Independent predictors for recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015;57:266–70. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 23. Chon KH, Lee JM, Koh EJ, Choi HY. Independent predictors for recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1541–8. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 24. Tugcu B, Tanriverdi O, Baydin S, Hergunsel B, Günaldi Ö, Ofluoglu E, et al. Can recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma be predicted? A retrospective analysis of 292 cases. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014;75:37–41. PubMed
- 25. Edlmann E, Giorgi-Coll S, Whitfield PC, Carpenter KLH, Hutchinson PJ. Pathophysiology of chronic subdural haematoma: inflammation, angiogenesis and implications for pharmacotherapy. J Neuroinflammation 2017;14:108. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 26. Saito K, Ito H, Hasegawa T, Yamamoto S. Plasmin-alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor complex and alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor in chronic subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg 1989;70:68–72. PubMed
- 27. Han HJ, Park CW, Kim EY, Yoo CJ, Kim YB, Kim WK. One vs. two burr hole craniostomy in surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;46:87–92. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 28. Kansal R, Nadkarni T, Goel A. Single versus double burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematomas. A study of 267 cases. J Clin Neurosci 2010;17:428–9. ArticlePubMed
- 29. Pahatouridis D, Alexiou GA, Fotakopoulos G, Mihos E, Zigouris A, Drosos D, et al. Chronic subdural haematomas: a comparative study of an enlarged single burr hole versus double burr hole drainage. Neurosurg Rev 2013;36:151–4; discussion 154. ArticlePubMedPDF
REFERENCES
Figure & Data
References
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Volumetric assessment in chronic subdural hematoma: a predictor of recurrence and guide for adjunctive therapy
Marlies Bauer, Aleksandrs Krigers, Julia Klingenschmid, Claudius Thomé
Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Irrigation practices in surgical evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of technique, fluid type, and temperature
Anders Schack, Bjartur Sæmundsson, Jiri Bartek, Alexander Fletcher-Sandersjöö, Thorbjørn Søren Rønn Jensen, Kåre Fugleholm
Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Factors Associated with Recurrence in Chronic Subdural Hematoma following Surgery
Kritsada Buakate, Thara Tunthanathip
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU.2024; 14(01): 085. CrossRef - Factors Associated With Short-Term Outcomes of Burr-Hole Craniostomy Associated With Brain Re-Expansion and Subdural Hematoma Shrinkage for Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Gyubin Lee, Yeongyu Jang, Kum Whang, Sungmin Cho, Jongyeon Kim, Byeongoh Kim, Jongwook Choi
Korean Journal of Neurotrauma.2023; 19(3): 324. CrossRef
PubReader
ePub Link
Cite
XML DownloadComparison of Outcomes and Recurrence in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Patients Treated by Burr-Hole Drainage with or without Irrigation
Comparison of Outcomes and Recurrence in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Patients Treated by Burr-Hole Drainage with or without Irrigation
| Total (n=82) | No recurrence (n=67; 81.7%) | Recurrence (n=15; 18.3%) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) | 60 (73.2) | 50 (74.6) | 10 (66.7) | 0.532 |
| Age | 70.2±12.1 | 70.2±12.0 | 70.1±13.4 | 0.986 |
| Head trauma history | 51 (62.2) | 43 (64.2) | 8 (53.3) | 0.434 |
| History | ||||
| Hypertension | 50 (61.0) | 39 (58.2) | 11 (73.3) | 0.278 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 20 (24.4) | 18 (26.9) | 2 (13.3) | 0.339 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 11 (13.4) | 8 (11.9) | 3 (20.0) | 0.414 |
| CRF | 4 (4.9) | 3 (4.5) | 1 (6.7) | 0.562 |
| Heart disease | 8 (9.8) | 6 (9.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.634 |
| Liver disease | 4 (4.9) | 3 (4.5) | 1 (6.7) | 0.562 |
| Alcoholism | 21 (25.6) | 18 (26.9) | 3 (20.0) | 0.749 |
| Smoking | 18 (22.0) | 17 (25.4) | 1 (6.7) | 0.171 |
| Coagulopathy |
6 (7.3) | 5 (7.5) | 1 (6.7) | 1.000 |
| Antiplatelet medication | 22 (26.8) | 14 (20.9) | 8 (53.3) | 0.021 |
| Dementia | 3 (3.7) | 2 (3.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.459 |
| Preoperative GCS | 13.8±2.5 | 13.9±2.6 | 13.5±2.4 | 0.665 |
| 15–14 | 61 (74.4) | 52 (77.6) | 9 (60.0) | 0.194 |
| 13–9 | 13 (15.9) | 9 (13.4) | 4 (26.7) | 0.243 |
| 8–3 | 8 (9.8) | 6 (9.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.634 |
| Bilateral lesion | 31 (37.8) | 23 (34.3) | 8 (53.3) | 0.170 |
| Computed tomography findings | ||||
| Preoperative homogenous hematoma | 35 (43.2) | 29 (43.9) | 6 (40.0) | 0.781 |
| H/N in homogenous hematoma | 36.3±10.9 | 35.6±11.5 | 40.0±6.3 | 0.373 |
| Preoperative hematoma thickness | 20.7±6.6 | 20.8±6.7 | 20.2±6.3 | 0.750 |
| Postoperative hematoma thickness | 11.2±5.4 | 11.1±5.6 | 11.7±4.6 | 0.700 |
| Prognosis using GOS | 4.7±0.75 | 4.8±0.74 | 4.6±0.83 | 0.458 |
| 5–4 (good) | 79 (96.3) | 65 (97.0) | 14 (93.3) | 0.459 |
| 3–1 (poor) | 3 (3.7) | 2 (3.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.459 |
| Operation methods | ||||
| Single burr-hole (group A) | 47 (57.3) | 35 (52.2) | 12 (80.0) | 0.049 |
| Single burr-hole irrigation (group B) | 14 (17.1) | 13 (19.4) | 1 (6.7) | 0.448 |
| Double burr-hole irrigation (group C) | 21 (25.6) | 19 (28.4) | 2 (13.3) | 0.332 |
| Group A (n=47) | Group B (n=14) | Group C (n=21) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) | 32 (68.2) | 10 (71.4) | 18 (85.7) | 0.145 |
| Age | 68.3±13.1 | 72.2±7.8 | 73.1±11.8 | 0.254 |
| Antiplatelet medication | 12 (25.5) | 6 (42.9) | 4 (19.0) | 0.766 |
| Preoperative homogenous hematoma | 18 (39.1) | 8 (57.1) | 9 (42.9) | 0.639 |
| Preoperative GCS | 13.7±2.6 | 13.9±3.2 | 13.8±2.1 | 0.972 |
| 15–14 | 34 (72.3) | 12 (85.7) | 15 (71.4) | 0.920 |
| 13–9 | 8 (17.0) | 1 (7.1) | 4 (19.0) | 0.966 |
| 8–3 | 5 (10.6) | 1 (7.1) | 2 (9.5) | 0.841 |
| Recurrence | 12 (25.5) | 1 (7.1) | 2 (9.5) | 0.081 |
| One burr-hole (A, B) (n=61) | Two burr-holes (C) (n=21) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrence | 13 (21.3) | 2 (9.5) | 0.332 |
| Antiplatelet medication | 18 (29.5) | 4 (19.0) | 0.351 |
| Outcome | |||
| Good | 58 (95.1) | 21 (100.0) | 0.566 |
| Poor | 3 (4.9) | 0 (0) | 0.566 |
| Non-irrigation (A) (n=47) | Irrigation (B, C) (n=35) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrence | 12 (25.5) | 3 (8.6) | 0.049 |
| Antiplatelet medication | 12 (25.5) | 10 (28.6) | 0.759 |
| Outcome | |||
| Good | 45 (95.7) | 34 (97.1) | 1.000 |
| Poor | 2 (4.3) | 1 (2.9) | 1.000 |
| Crude OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR |
Adjusted OR |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Irrigation | 0.06 (0.07–1.06) | 0.29 (0.07–1.16) | 0.20 (0.04–0.97) |
| Two burr-holes | 0.39 (0.08–1.89) | 0.41 (0.08–2.06) | 0.38 (0.60–2.38) |
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics according to recurrence
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). CRF: chronic renal failure, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale, H/N: Hounsfield unit number, GOS: Glasgow Outcome Scale. Coagulopathy was defined by laboratory values (elevated prothrombin or partial thromboplastin time and thrombocytopenia).
Table 2. Comparison of three surgical methods
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale.
Table 3. Postoperative outcomes according to the number of burr-holes
Values are presented as number (%).
Table 4. Postoperative outcomes according to intraoperative irrigation status
Values are presented as number (%).
Table 5. Logistic regression to calculate ORs for CSDH recurrence after burr-hole operation according to the surgical method used.
OR: odds ratio, CSDH: chronic subdural hematoma, CI: confidence interval. Adjusted for age, sex, alcoholism, and smoking. Adjusted for age, sex, alcoholism, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, and antiplatelet medication.
