KST
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Case Report
- Successful minimally invasive management using transcatheter arterial embolization in a hemodynamically stable elderly patient with mesenteric vascular injury in a hybrid emergency room system in Korea: a case report
- So Ra Ahn, Joo Hyun Lee, Sang Hyun Seo, Chan Yong Park
- J Trauma Inj. 2023;36(4):435-440. Published online July 25, 2023
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2023.0018
- 5,208 View
- 53 Download
- 2 Web of Science
- 3 Citations
-
Abstract
PDF - Mesenteric injury occurs rarely in cases associated with blunt abdominal trauma. Despite its low incidence, mesenteric injury can lead to fatal outcomes such as hypovolemic shock due to hemoperitoneum or sepsis due to intestinal ischemia, or perforation-related peritonitis. For mesenteric injuries, especially those involving massive bleeding, intestinal ischemia, and perforation, the standard treatment is surgery. However, in the case of operative management, it should be borne in mind that there is a possibility of complications and mortality during and after surgery. The usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is well known in solid organs but is controversial for mesenteric injury. We present a 75-year-old man with mesenteric injury due to blunt abdominal trauma. Initial abdominal computed tomography showed no hemoperitoneum, but a mesenteric contusion and pseudoaneurysm with a diameter of 17 mm were observed near the origin of the superior mesenteric artery. Since there were no findings requiring emergency surgery such as free air or intestinal ischemia, it was decided to perform nonoperative management with TAE using microcoils in hybrid emergency room system. TAE was performed successfully, and there were no complications such as bleeding, bowel ischemia, or delayed bowel perforation. He was discharged on the 23rd day after admission with percutaneous catheter drainage for drainage of mesenteric hematoma. The authors believe that treatment with TAE for highly selected elderly patients with mesenteric injuries has the positive aspect of minimally invasive management, considering the burden of general anesthesia and the various avoidable intraoperative and postoperative complications.
-
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Management of a traumatic superior mesenteric artery injury using superselective angioembolization
Martha Ennis, Jurgienne Umali, David Pace
Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and.2025; 11(2): 101726. CrossRef - Successful Non-Operative Management of Middle Colic Artery Injury Using Transcatheter Arterial Embolization Performed in a Hybrid Emergency Room System
Joo Hyun Lee, So Ra Ahn, Sang Hyun Seo, Chan Yong Park
Journal of Acute Care Surgery.2025; 15(1): 30. CrossRef - Abdomen (A Pandora’s Box): A Delayed Presentation of Blunt Abdominal Injury With a Mesenteric Tear Leading to Gangrenous Bowel
Abishek Prasenaa, Thinagaran K, Reegan Jose , Karthick G
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Original Article- The Choice of Management in Patients with Splenic Blunt Trauma: A Single Center Study
- Ji Young Jang, Seung Hwan Lee, Jae Gil Lee
- J Trauma Inj. 2013;26(4):280-285.
- 1,260 View
- 6 Download
-
Abstract
PDF
- PURPOSE
Nowadays, non-operative management increases in patients with blunt splenic injury due to development of diagnostic and interventional technique. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the management in patients with blunt splenic injury and effect of clinical state such as shock on the choice of management.
METHODS
From April 2007 to July 2013, we retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of fifty patients who had splenic injury after blunt trauma. The demographic characteristics, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade of splenic injury, management method (emergency operation, angiographic embolization or observation) and clinical outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS
The mean age was 41.5+/-21.4 years and male was 44(88%). Twenty patients(40%) were in shock condition initially and five patients(10%) underwent emergency operation due to hemodynamic instability. Emergency angiographic embolization was performed in 20 patients(40%) and 25 patients were managed conservatively. When patients were divided into shock group (SG) and non-shock group (NSG), Patients in SG had significantly higher serum lactate level and base deficit than NSG (lactate; 4.5+/-3.4 mmol/L, base deficit; 5.8+/-4.4 mmol/L vs 1.9+/-1.4 mmol/L, 2.8+/-2.5 mmol/L, p=0.007, p=0.013). There was no significant difference of AAST grade and contrast blush rate in abdomen CT between two groups. Among 45 patients with non-operative management, four patients(8.9%) got delayed angiographic embolization and 3 patient died from companied organ injury.
CONCLUSION
Non-operative management can be acceptable management option in patients with splenic blunt trauma under intensive hemodynamic monitoring. -
Summary
First
Prev
